Cancun Ministerial Meeting
Printable version | More info
Prior to Cancun The fifth ministerial meeting took place in Cancun,
in Mexico, in September 2003. Since the launching of the Doha Development Agenda, two years earlier there had been intensive negotiations among WTO Members to meet deadlines that were established in the Doha Declaration. In these instances, agreement was supposed to be reached on a variety of important issues prior to the Cancun meeting.

Missed DeadlinesIn particular, modalities were to be established for further liberalisation of trade in both industrial and agricultural goods.
In discussing these modalities, it quickly became clear to all concerned that agreement on agriculture would not come easily. Despite numerous proposals there was no consensus on how to achieve substantial improvements in market access an eventual phase out of all forms of export subsidies and substantial reductions in trade-distorting domestic support. There were also other important areas where progress was being made. For instance, in Cancun, Members were to report on their negotiations on the relationship between the WTO and the many multilateral environment agreements that contain trade related provisions. At the time of Cancun, the position of Members remained far apart on both this and other matters.

Optimism Prevails Notwithstanding the challenges facing delegations in Cancun, many remained optimistic.
They were encouraged, in particular, by a breakthrough in the days prior to the Cancun meeting. This came in the form of an Agreement on the use of compulsory licensing provisions of the TRIPS Agreement in order to improve the access of impoverished nations to essential medicines. Further, the process of countries acceding to the WTO was progressing, with the accession of Cambodia and Nepal to be announced in Cancun. These are the first least-developed countries to accede to the WTO since its establishment.

No agreement at Cancun Despite further intensive negotiations among Ministers at Cancun,
no agreement could be struck on a number of core issues. In particular, there was no agreement on how to proceed with the Singapore issues, and whether they should be dealt with individually, collectively, or not at all. A further stumbling block related to agreement on the modalities for future negotiations in agriculture. An important development with respect to both these issues was the emergence of twenty-one developing countries from very different parts of the world negotiating from a common position. There was also disappointment on the part of some particularly impoverished developing countries that a more positive result could not be achieved in removing trade-distorting subsidies for products of special export interest to them such as cotton and sugar.

|