Settling Disputes: the heart of the system
Printable version | More info
A dispute about what?What if WTO members believe that other members are violating trade rules in
any of the agreements mentioned so far? The answer is that they will use the
multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally.
That means abiding by the agreed procedures of the WTO Dispute Settlement
Understanding. Typically, a dispute arises when one country adopts a trade
policy measure, or takes some action, that one or more fellow WTO members
consider to be breaking the WTO agreements. It can also arise when a member
fails to live up to its obligations.

Rapid settlementThe WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding emphasizes that prompt settlement
of disputes is essential if the WTO is to function effectively. It therefore
sets out in considerable detail the procedures and the timetable to be followed
in resolving disputes. If a case runs its full course, it should not normally
take more than one year or 15 months if the case is appealed.

Better than GATTUnder the previous GATT procedure, rulings could only be adopted by
consensus. This meant that a single objection could block the ruling. It was
therefore possible for the losing country to block the adoption of the ruling.
Rulings are now automatically adopted unless there is a consensus to reject them
— any country wanting to block a ruling has to persuade all other WTO members
--- including its adversary in the case --- to share its view. Although much of
the procedure does resemble a court or tribunal, the preferred solution is for
the countries concerned to discuss their problems and settle the dispute by
themselves.

How are disputes settled?Settling disputes is the responsibility of the Dispute Settlement Body -
which is the General Council in another guise. It has the sole authority to
establish "panels" of experts to consider a case, and to accept or reject the
panels' findings or the results of an appeal. It monitors the implementation of
rulings and recommendations, and has the power to authorize retaliation when a
country does not comply with a ruling.

Right to AppealEither side can appeal a panel's ruling. Sometimes both sides do so.
Appeals have to be based on points of law such as legal interpretation. They
cannot re-examine existing evidence or examine new evidence.

More is BetterThe WTO deals with an increasing number of dispute settlement cases. Does
this mean that law and order is breaking down? Not necessarily. Sometimes it
means that people are turning more to the courts instead of taking the law into
their own hands. There are strong grounds for arguing that the increasing
number of disputes is simply the result of expanding world trade and the
stricter rules that now apply. The fact that more disputes are coming to the
WTO reflects a growing faith in the system.

|