Progressing by packages
Printable version | More info
Gradual evolution The development of the rules based multilateral trading system has been a gradual
one and the evolution has progressed through rounds of negotiations. The importance
of these rounds can not be over emphasized. The most recent of the completed
rounds is the Uruguay Round. The current round is the Doha Development Agenda.

Package approachNegotiating through rounds of negotiations can be lengthy. The Uruguay Round
took seven and a half years. However, negotiating agreements in the context of
rounds has its advantages. They offer a package approach to trade negotiations
that can sometimes be more fruitful than negotiations on a single issue. The
size of the package can mean more benefits because participants can seek and
secure advantages across a wide range of issues.

Making trade-offsIn such a package, the ability to trade-off the different issues can make
agreement easier to reach. Not all the outcomes of each of the issues under
negotiations is necessarily of benefit - or even of interest - to every
country. Nevertheless, for everyone to agree, each country must see that it is
in their interest to adopt the total package. In this manner, reform in
politically-sensitive sectors of world trade - such as agricultural - can be
more feasible in the context of a global package if agriculture reform is complemented
by other market openings. As far as developing countries are concerned, they
have a greater chance of influencing the multilateral trading system in a trade
round than in bilateral negotiations with powerful trading nations.

Strengths and weaknesses But wide ranging rounds have both strengths and weaknesses. The results of
the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of multi-sector rounds versus
single-sector negotiations is ambiguous. At some stages, the Uruguay Round
seemed so cumbersome that reaching agreement in every subject by all
participating countries appeared impossible.

|